-
Website
http://blog.gamerdna.com/ -
Original page
http://blog.gamerdna.com/blog/2009/03/18/march-16th-release-notes/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Dan Luptak
2 comments · 1 points
-
cohen12
1 comment · 1 points
-
RatherBeBiking
1 comment · 2 points
-
dbuhos
2 comments · 1 points
-
Retodon8
7 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Maybe a place to show who owns whatever review site the content is coming from would help. At least then we'll know when we're being mind controlled...
gamerDNA itself doesn't review, only its members do.
Actually individual gDNA staff members do review, but I don't think that would create a conflict unless developer, publisher, etc. would sponsor them.
These new, external reviews show the "Crispy Gamer" label quite clearly.
I'm sure future external reviews by others would be shown the same way.
Also, unlike gDNA member reviews, the external ones are indented.
See: http://www.gamerdna.com/game/halo-wars-xbox-360
I agree with your sentiment, it really is nice to know where a review is coming from.
That way you can decide to appoint whatever value you think a review by X or Y is worth.
I'm just saying that it's easy enough to distinguish between the two kinds, isn't it?